While the early bird gets the worm, some early worms can end up poisoning you. Despite never having tested this hypothesis ourselves directly, the world of technology is full of examples of systems and ideas that start strong, only to have wildly different results. Sometimes these systems come without downsides or risks, where getting involved is a simple extension of being technologically savvy. Other times, new tech demands a leap of faith and heavy investment that can end up hurting users in the long run. Looking at examples from both sides of the spectrum, we want to examine the good and the bad, to see where the line lies in being enthusiastic, trusting, or overconfident.
The Good
For the best examples of leveraging the benefits of tech, proven industries and concepts serve as the baseline for what can be trusted. Some of the best examples of this are found in the online betting industry, where special features like bingo offers can take a user’s experience even further. Through additions like deposit matches, these systems let players get more from their money, and while this might seem too good to be true, with a proven track record, these are systems that users can trust. This level of consolidation over decades is a key aspect here to pay attention to, as the big names continue to show themselves worthy. When these first appeared, it would make sense to be wary, but today, the success of the big names is undeniable.
The Bad
Of the promising technology that many early adopters have enjoyed only to regret it later, most centre on subscription services tied to hardware. The most famous of these tie into smart home functionality, which while fantastic when they work, can fail to the point of literally leaving users in the dark. This is what happened with the smart home system Insteon, which abruptly shut down its systems which controlled devices like lights, thermostats, plugs, and sensors. Fortunately, open-source smart home systems have been able to aid users in recovering some degree of use, but with a harsh lesson learned.
The Risky
Today, any new digital system tied to a physical service is one which needs to be scrutinized. Again dipping its toes into the realm of smart technology, the Tovala smart oven is designed specially to work with the company’s proprietary fresh meal kits. While it succeeds well with this task, standing the test of time with this kind of subscription model is a tough ask. Smart functionality has a rocky history, subscription novelty food like Soylent has a rocky history, and combining the two is a definite risk.
Looking over these examples, we can draw a few conclusions on when technological offers should be trusted, and when users should be wary. In the case of online casinos, proven track records and positive reviews dating back years in an industry with high safety standards make engagement reliable. Enthusiasm for newer tech, however, is more complicated. In the case of subscription services, the best bet that users have is a backup plan in case the original system fails. Buy a smart home system that can accept reliable open-source platforms, for example, or smart gadgets that still offer full regular functionality if smart functions fail.
It’s a matter of planning ahead, shoring bets, and knowing the difference between business goals and historical reality. Even if you look before you leap, prepare for future changes in depth, and you’ll be able to stay afloat.