Constantly testing software, very often many teams, due to adherence to the standard model, test functionality based on test cases or checklists. It’s clear that the larger the organization, the larger and more complex the process of developing and writing test cases. However, the risk based testing approach has shown wonderful results in comparison with other approaches, that’s why it attracts the attention of a huge amount of companies today.
If for a company which develops boxed software it is often enough to simply prepare a checklist for testing, then in large organizations such as banks, telecoms, retail, an automated test management system is often used. It allows you to conduct a full cycle of developing test cases, starting from the development of requirements, and ending with the approval and validation of test cases, the size of which can exceed 30 steps if we are testing an end-to-end business process.
Although, with the development of flexible methodology, more and more often we have to abandon the test case model, because the preparation stage just takes an incredibly large amount of time, which unfortunately is not in short sprints. Someone switches to checklists, thereby reducing the test case development process in time, someone begins to prioritize test cases depending on the importance of the business process, but nevertheless, the approach to testing does not change from this.
Table of Contents
What is risk and what is risk-based testing?
Risk is the probability of an undesirable outcome. And this result is related to influence. Risk-based testing involves first testing the functionality that has the greatest impact and probability of failure and in the most critical places. Risk-based testing involves analyzing and measuring metrics in these critical areas. Fortunately, there are companies, like Inoxoft, which are ready to help you with this kind of testing.
Also, such testing may include the use of analytical tools that are not strictly QA’s competence, but help us choose more effective tests.
It’s important to ensure the customer-expected quality when developing apps and to confirm that the project’s initial requirements have been satisfied. These two goals are where the idea of QA (Quality Assurance) comes from.
It goes without saying that every development team needs at least one member who serves as the project’s quality manager and conducts minor tests. The QA manager is in charge of finding any programme flaws, including bugs and problems.
One can assume that conducting an application test phase at the conclusion of development is not necessary from the perspective of a traditional organizational structure. However, development and QA testing must coexist in teams using agile approaches. It is best to verify that everything is functioning at each sprint, spot any issues, and fix them as quickly as feasible.
You need to know that the main logic of conducting risk-based testing is to reduce the overall risk. Moreover, it also works to reduce the probability of defects, especially bugs with a high impact on the system, which can affect it as painfully as possible.
Risk-based testing should be started at the beginning of the project and use this knowledge in the test plan. The purpose of testing is to make the project not a completely risk-free project. It means that you will definitely avoid problems with your software or application after the development process.
A risk-based approach as an effective tool for managing your projects
It’s always like test preparation, because you can’t say enough testing and there are no more software defects, even if they design and run a lot of tests. There is a point when software stability will not be doubly insured by increasing the number of test cases. At this point in time, focus not only on the number of tests, but also on what the consumer actually expects from the release.
So, it’s important to strike a balance in test optimization to get the most out of a reasonable testing effort. In addition, this is more important when the testing time is very limited and there are not enough resources to conduct sufficient testing.
Thus, in this case, the risk based testing approach plays a key role in optimizing quality assurance efforts and maximizing profitable testing with minimal commercial risk.
When do we need to use the RBT approach?
Nowadays it is usually used in the following scenarios:
- This approach can be used when there are constraints or constraints on time, cost, and project resources, and when there is a need to optimize resources.
- The RBT approach is used when the application is more complex and adapts new technologies, and therefore involves many challenges.
- When the program is a research project, and it is of the first type, there are a number of unknowns and risks in the project.
Diversity of risk analysis ways
There is no standard process or template as such that allows software testing risk analysis for every product feature. Different organizations use their own approach to risk analysis methods.
Risk analysis can be carried out on different articles of the project to identify risks and implement the RBT approach to analysis. These items include:
- Features;
- Functional capabilities;
- User stories;
- Requirements;
- Usage cases;
- Test cases.
In this case, let’s focus only on test cases to understand the implementation of the risk-based approach.
You can see that the importance of this phase of your application or software development is crucial to ensure that your users will appreciate the best possible product. However, the QA phase is just as important as having the right supplier.
When you work with professional and experienced IT teams, they know what you need, you can trust their work. That’s why you should be very confident in the process of choosing the partners. Thanks to an extensive database of professionals, and experienced teams in all types of projects your company will be able to get the best results! As you can see, risk based testing is a wonderful tool to avoid having problems with your software or application in the future.